$ rejected_by_uppercase.gallery
/// wall of shame for works deemed "unworthy" by the fancy curators
/// their loss is our treasure ✨
untitled_sadness.jpg
by user_37728
$12
Curator Feedback:
"Lacks conceptual rigor. The emotional directness undermines any potential for critical discourse."
my_cat_but_rainbow.png
by rainbow_wizard
$5
Curator Feedback:
"Derivative appropriation of internet aesthetics without sufficient theoretical framework."
existence_is_pain.gif
by void_screamer
$25
Curator Feedback:
"While the existential themes show promise, the execution lacks the sophistication required for institutional presentation."
dogs_wearing_hats_collage.jpg
by dog_mom_forever
$8
Curator Feedback:
"Anthropomorphic imagery fails to engage with contemporary critical discourse around human-animal relations."
abstract_mess_#47.jpg
by chaos_painter
$15
Curator Feedback:
"Random mark-making without conceptual foundation. Abstraction requires intellectual underpinning."
digital_scream.mp4
by pixel_rebel
$30
Curator Feedback:
"Technical facility evident but lacks the curatorial context necessary for serious consideration."
$ rejection_stats.exe
rejection rate
(they hate fun)
avg markup when "elevated"
(pure greed tbh)
artistic value here
(priceless chaos)
* remember: rejection by institutions is often the highest form of artistic validation
** these "curators" wouldn't recognize genius if it bit them
*** keep uploading your beautiful weird stuff! ✨